Decision Matrix
A decision matrix is a quantitative tool for comparing multiple options against weighted criteria. It transforms subjective comparisons into structured analysis.
When to Use
Use a decision matrix when:
- You have 2+ options to compare
- Multiple factors influence the decision
- You want to reduce emotional bias
- The stakes justify systematic analysis
Example: Investment Account Selection
Which account type should you prioritize for retirement savings?
Excelled in Employer Match (25% weight, +2.5 points) and Tax Advantage (30% weight, +0.3 points)
| Option | Score | Tax Advantage | Flexibility | Growth Potential | Employer Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ★ 401(k) | 100% | 2.7 | 0.6 | 1.8 | 2.5 |
| Roth IRA | 74% | 2.4 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 0.0 |
| Taxable Brokerage | 58% | 0.6 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 0.0 |
Strengths & Weaknesses
401(k)
Roth IRA
Taxable Brokerage
Analysis method: Weighted Score
How to Read This
- Winner — The option with the highest weighted score
- Confidence — How much the winner leads (low = close race)
- Scores — Weighted contribution of each criterion
- Strengths/Weaknesses — What each option excels at or lacks
The Method
1. Define Options
List the choices you’re comparing. Be specific:
- ❌ “Invest more”
- ✅ “Max 401(k)”, “Max Roth IRA”, “Taxable brokerage”
2. Define Criteria
What factors matter? Common financial criteria:
| Category | Criteria Examples |
|---|---|
| Returns | Growth potential, dividend yield, historical performance |
| Risk | Volatility, downside protection, diversification |
| Access | Liquidity, withdrawal penalties, loan options |
| Tax | Tax advantage, tax-loss harvesting, estate planning |
| Cost | Fees, expense ratios, transaction costs |
3. Assign Weights
Weights reflect importance. Must sum to 1.0 (or be auto-normalized).
Tax Advantage: 0.30 (30% importance)
Flexibility: 0.20 (20% importance)
Growth: 0.25 (25% importance)
Employer Match: 0.25 (25% importance)
─────────────────────────────────────
Total: 1.00
4. Score Each Option
Rate each option on each criterion (typically 1-10):
| Option | Tax | Flexibility | Growth | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 401(k) | 9 | 3 | 7 | 10 |
| Roth IRA | 8 | 6 | 8 | 0 |
| Taxable | 2 | 10 | 7 | 0 |
5. Calculate & Analyze
The matrix multiplies scores by weights and ranks options. The winner isn’t always obvious—that’s the point.
Limitations
Decision matrices are tools, not oracles:
- Garbage in, garbage out — Scores and weights are still subjective
- Doesn’t capture everything — Some factors resist quantification
- False precision — A score of 7.23 isn’t meaningfully different from 7.18
- Close races need judgment — If confidence is low, other factors should decide
More Examples
Example: Job Offer Comparison
Excelled in Job Security (15% weight, +0.9 points) and Salary (25% weight, +0.8 points)
| Option | Score | Salary | Work-Life Balance | Growth Potential | Job Security | Learning |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ★ Big Tech | 100% | 2.3 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 |
| Startup | 86% | 1.5 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 1.8 |
| Consulting | 86% | 2.0 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
Strengths & Weaknesses
Big Tech
Startup
Consulting
Analysis method: Weighted Score
Context: Comparing job offers based on what matters to you. Adjust weights based on your life situation—new grad might prioritize learning, while a parent might prioritize work-life balance.
Example: Side Hustle Evaluation
Excelled in Income Potential (25% weight, +0.8 points) and Skill Match (20% weight, +0.6 points)
| Option | Score | Startup Cost | Time Flexibility | Income Potential | Scalability | Skill Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ★ Consulting | 100% | 1.3 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| Content Creation | 96% | 1.2 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Freelancing | 95% | 1.3 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| E-commerce | 84% | 0.6 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 1.0 |
⚠️ Scores are within 4.1 points between 'Consulting' and 'Content Creation' — treat as a statistical tie.
Strengths & Weaknesses
Consulting
Content Creation
Freelancing
E-commerce
Analysis method: Weighted Score
Context: Evaluating side income opportunities. Time flexibility weighted high for those with full-time jobs. Income potential and scalability matter for long-term wealth building.
Example: Housing Decision (Rent vs Buy)
Excelled in Flexibility (20% weight, +1.2 points) and Monthly Cost (25% weight, +0.5 points)
| Option | Score | Monthly Cost | Flexibility | Wealth Building | Maintenance | Space |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ★ Rent Apartment | 100% | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.6 |
| Buy Condo | 91% | 1.5 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 0.9 |
| Buy House | 88% | 1.0 | 0.6 | 2.3 | 0.4 | 1.5 |
Strengths & Weaknesses
Rent Apartment
Buy Condo
Buy House
Analysis method: Weighted Score
Context: The rent vs buy debate depends heavily on your situation. Those who value flexibility might prefer renting. Those focused on long-term wealth building might prefer buying.
See also
- Introduction — Framework overview and core principles
- Latest Updates — Recent additions to the wiki