How To Win Capitalism

This site is password protected.

Incorrect password

This content is not intended to replace, nor is it in any part meant to be interpreted as, the advice of a licensed professional. This is a personal research site and should be taken as such.

Decision Matrix

A decision matrix is a quantitative tool for comparing multiple options against weighted criteria. It transforms subjective comparisons into structured analysis.

When to Use

Use a decision matrix when:

Example: Investment Account Selection

Which account type should you prioritize for retirement savings?

Investment Account Comparison
Winner: 401(k) (49% confidence)

Excelled in Employer Match (25% weight, +2.5 points) and Tax Advantage (30% weight, +0.3 points)

Option Score Tax AdvantageFlexibilityGrowth PotentialEmployer Match
401(k) 100% 2.70.61.82.5
Roth IRA 74% 2.41.22.00.0
Taxable Brokerage 58% 0.62.01.80.0
Recommendation: Moderate recommendation: '401(k)' is best (100.0%), but 'Roth IRA' (74.2%) is competitive. Consider other factors.
Strengths & Weaknesses

401(k)

Strengths: Tax AdvantageEmployer Match
Weaknesses: Flexibility

Roth IRA

Strengths: Tax AdvantageGrowth Potential
Weaknesses: Employer Match

Taxable Brokerage

Strengths: FlexibilityGrowth Potential
Weaknesses: Employer Match

Analysis method: Weighted Score

How to Read This

  1. Winner — The option with the highest weighted score
  2. Confidence — How much the winner leads (low = close race)
  3. Scores — Weighted contribution of each criterion
  4. Strengths/Weaknesses — What each option excels at or lacks

The Method

1. Define Options

List the choices you’re comparing. Be specific:

2. Define Criteria

What factors matter? Common financial criteria:

CategoryCriteria Examples
ReturnsGrowth potential, dividend yield, historical performance
RiskVolatility, downside protection, diversification
AccessLiquidity, withdrawal penalties, loan options
TaxTax advantage, tax-loss harvesting, estate planning
CostFees, expense ratios, transaction costs

3. Assign Weights

Weights reflect importance. Must sum to 1.0 (or be auto-normalized).

Tax Advantage: 0.30 (30% importance)
Flexibility:   0.20 (20% importance)
Growth:        0.25 (25% importance)
Employer Match: 0.25 (25% importance)
─────────────────────────────────────
Total:         1.00

4. Score Each Option

Rate each option on each criterion (typically 1-10):

OptionTaxFlexibilityGrowthMatch
401(k)93710
Roth IRA8680
Taxable21070

5. Calculate & Analyze

The matrix multiplies scores by weights and ranks options. The winner isn’t always obvious—that’s the point.

Limitations

Decision matrices are tools, not oracles:


More Examples

Example: Job Offer Comparison
Job Offer Comparison
Winner: Big Tech (27% confidence)

Excelled in Job Security (15% weight, +0.9 points) and Salary (25% weight, +0.8 points)

Option Score SalaryWork-Life BalanceGrowth PotentialJob SecurityLearning
Big Tech 100% 2.31.41.21.31.2
Startup 86% 1.50.81.80.41.8
Consulting 86% 2.00.61.40.81.6
Recommendation: Weak recommendation: Options are closely matched. Top choices: Big Tech, Startup, Consulting. Consider additional criteria or stakeholder input.
Strengths & Weaknesses

Big Tech

Strengths: SalaryWork-Life Balance
Weaknesses: LearningGrowth Potential

Startup

Strengths: Growth PotentialLearning
Weaknesses: Job SecurityWork-Life Balance

Consulting

Strengths: SalaryLearning
Weaknesses: Work-Life BalanceJob Security

Analysis method: Weighted Score

Context: Comparing job offers based on what matters to you. Adjust weights based on your life situation—new grad might prioritize learning, while a parent might prioritize work-life balance.

Example: Side Hustle Evaluation
Side Hustle Evaluation
Winner: Consulting (8% confidence)

Excelled in Income Potential (25% weight, +0.8 points) and Skill Match (20% weight, +0.6 points)

Option Score Startup CostTime FlexibilityIncome PotentialScalabilitySkill Match
Consulting 100% 1.31.52.00.81.8
Content Creation 96% 1.22.31.31.21.2
Freelancing 95% 1.32.01.50.61.6
E-commerce 84% 0.61.32.01.31.0

⚠️ Scores are within 4.1 points between 'Consulting' and 'Content Creation' — treat as a statistical tie.

Recommendation: Weak recommendation: Options are closely matched. Top choices: Consulting, Content Creation, Freelancing. Consider additional criteria or stakeholder input.
Strengths & Weaknesses

Consulting

Strengths: Income PotentialSkill Match
Weaknesses: ScalabilityStartup Cost

Content Creation

Strengths: Time FlexibilityIncome Potential
Weaknesses: ScalabilityStartup Cost

Freelancing

Strengths: Time FlexibilitySkill Match
Weaknesses: ScalabilityStartup Cost

E-commerce

Strengths: Income PotentialScalability
Weaknesses: Startup CostSkill Match

Analysis method: Weighted Score

Context: Evaluating side income opportunities. Time flexibility weighted high for those with full-time jobs. Income potential and scalability matter for long-term wealth building.

Example: Housing Decision (Rent vs Buy)
Housing Decision
Winner: Rent Apartment (17% confidence)

Excelled in Flexibility (20% weight, +1.2 points) and Monthly Cost (25% weight, +0.5 points)

Option Score Monthly CostFlexibilityWealth BuildingMaintenanceSpace
Rent Apartment 100% 2.02.00.51.50.6
Buy Condo 91% 1.50.81.81.10.9
Buy House 88% 1.00.62.30.41.5
Recommendation: Weak recommendation: Options are closely matched. Top choices: Rent Apartment, Buy Condo, Buy House. Consider additional criteria or stakeholder input.
Strengths & Weaknesses

Rent Apartment

Strengths: Monthly CostFlexibility
Weaknesses: Wealth BuildingSpace

Buy Condo

Strengths: Wealth BuildingMonthly Cost
Weaknesses: FlexibilitySpace

Buy House

Strengths: Wealth BuildingSpace
Weaknesses: MaintenanceFlexibility

Analysis method: Weighted Score

Context: The rent vs buy debate depends heavily on your situation. Those who value flexibility might prefer renting. Those focused on long-term wealth building might prefer buying.


See also